<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success (Bryde, 2008)</title>
	<link>http://blog.budzier.com/2008/10/03/perceptions-of-the-impact-of-project-sponsorship-practices-on-project-success-bryde-2008/</link>
	<description>Summaries of Project Management Research Studies</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Von: classes of medical devices</title>
		<link>http://blog.budzier.com/2008/10/03/perceptions-of-the-impact-of-project-sponsorship-practices-on-project-success-bryde-2008/#comment-3254</link>
		<author>classes of medical devices</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.budzier.com/2008/10/03/perceptions-of-the-impact-of-project-sponsorship-practices-on-project-success-bryde-2008/#comment-3254</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;classes of medical devices...&lt;/strong&gt;

There are two schools of thought in the industry concerning the origin of quality manuals. One categorically declares that a single, common quality manual will not work and that each company should develop its own. This conviction stems from the belief...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>classes of medical devices&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There are two schools of thought in the industry concerning the origin of quality manuals. One categorically declares that a single, common quality manual will not work and that each company should develop its own. This conviction stems from the belief&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

